The concept of designer babies begin in 1978 with the introduction of in vitro fertilization, a process now widely accepted by families within the United States and the world. Since then, the field of genetic enhancements by gene selection has grown substantially. Basic in vitro fertilization is common practice today and we have moved toward pre-gender selection, and to top it off, scientists are decoding the human genome for physical and psychological qualities increasing the options for families in the future. The main focus of the linked article though is the choice for couples to preselect genes against specific diseases and the ethical repercussions. Would we be opening the flood gates in allowing gene selection, resulting in generations of genetic super babies?
According to polls, individuals don't find it morally wrong to preselect genes against disease in future generations of children; the ultimate goal of scientists involved in genetic manipulation. Research has found segments of the human genome that when defective are responsible for certain forms of cancer. Scientists are focusing on these advancements in the hope that 25 years from now we will have mapped every gene segment responsible for disease/disorder, allowing for a society of super-resistant children. As wonderful as this may sound, there are many controversies with this form of research, where will it end? How far will we go in the quest toward perfection? Will physical and psychological abilities be next? Many believe the potential of options in physical and psychological genetic enhancements would lead to a generation of similar people. At this time the thought is repulsive and disturbing to most. Leaving an unclear future for the designer babies. As Boston University's bioethicist George Annas says, "It could radically change our view of human life, our view of children, our view of parenthood, our view of our relationships to each other and what it means to be human."
No comments:
Post a Comment